Interprofessional e-learning objects (IPLO)


Do you have difficulty finding learning and teaching materials for Interprofessional education?
Would you find case studies that could be used for Interprofessional learning helpful?
Do you need an authentic patient journey to conribute to a module or course?
Have you a use for a vignette or story that can be used for inetrprofessional working?
If the any of your answers is yes, please go to our cipel repository to access the learning tools. You will find them at:http//curve.coventry.ac.uk



Literature exploring attitudes to IPE


Please see below a selection of articles exploring attitudes to IPE:
Coster, S. et al. (2008) Interprofessional attitudes amongst undergraduate students in the health professions: A longitudinal questionnaire survey International Journal of Nursing Studies 45 1667-1681 [This paper makes reference to a ‘Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale’ (RIPLS), a ‘Professional Identity Scale’ and a ‘Contact index’.]

Fruber, C. et al. (2004) Interprofessional education in a midwifery curriculum: the learning through the exploration of the professional task project (LEAPT) Midwifery, 20, 358-366 [lists statements on team-working and interprofessional working; students are asked to rank the statements]

Pollard, K.C. & Miers, M.E. (2008) From students to professionals: Results of a longitudinal study of attitudes to pre-qualifying collaborative learning and working in health and social care in the UK Journal of Interprofessional Care 22(4) 399-416 [A study compares attitudes to interprofessional practice between one group which experienced IPE and another which educated on uniprofessional curricula]

Ward, J. et al. (2008) The Jefferson Scale of Attitudes toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration: A study with undergraduate nursing students Journal of interprofessional Care 22(4) 375-386 [reference the ‘Jefferson Scale of Attitudes toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration’ (JSAPNC) and the ‘Jefferson Scale of Empathy’ (JSE)]

Many thanks To Kathy Courtney for the above suggestions.



Interprofessional e-learning


Computer assisted learning (CAL) or e-learning may be one of a number of solutions to the delivery of Interprofessional education. E-approaches are thought to offer potential solutions to some of the barriers with Interprofessional education (namely deliverying IPE to large numbers of health and social care students, logistical aspects, accommodation and time constraints)
Possible barriers to Interprofessional learning include:

Barrier - Lack of appropriate learning material. Most health related digital resources focus on individual rather than collaborative learning.
E-advantage. Students can collaborate around e-resources (scenarios and activities) that are precisely tailored to address IPL outcomes and capabilities, and which encourage collaborative learning

Barrier - Stereotypical and counter-productive views of other professions often stemming from lack of knowledge of the roles, skills, values and philosophies espoused by other professions.
E-advantage. Students can explore differences in philosophical approaches, values and models of practice in a safe virtual learning environment.

Barrier - Limited professional representation: No single HEI in the UK offers programmes for every health and social care profession. This means that there are inevitably institutionally biased gaps in professional representation and perspectives which can undermine the validity and relevance of IPL
E-advantage. Students can gain access to professions which have interacted with the patient/client but who are not represented in the HEI. (Either through representation in the e-resource or guest participation in online interactions).

Barrier - Professional status and power relationships. Documented evidence suggests that students from professions perceived as ‘less powerful’ may be reticent about expressing their views when in the presence of ‘more powerful, higher status’ professions.
E-advantage. Online interaction permits timely and considered responses: students have time to form a group identity in which they feel comfortable about sharing insights.

Barrier - Unequal exposure to inter-professional collaboration during practice placements. Some placements expose students to frequent interactions with other professionals and good practice in inter-professional working, many placements do not.
E-advantage. Through e-resources, students can experience a wider and more equitable range of opportunities to fulfil IPL capabilities than can be guaranteed by their individual practice placements

Barrier - Capacity and logistics. There is often insufficient teaching space with appropriately sized and configured breakout rooms to accommodate large numbers of students from different professional courses. Meanwhile all health and social care courses require students to spend a significant part of their learning time in practice settings. Thus opportunities for inter-professional ‘classes’ are severely constrained and impacted by timetabling restrictions.
E-advantage. The use of e-approaches to IPL enables students to undertake learning at any time of day or night while in the University or on placement. Thus they can communicate via virtual learning sets even when geographically separate.

Barrier - Addressing the patient perspective: As the principle of IPL is to encourage inter-professional working around the needs of the patient, then it follows that IPL must be informed by the patient’s voice. This introduces further logistical and ethical barriers (related to patient consent and data protection) to achieving effective patient-centred IPL for large numbers of students without intimidating the patient.
E-Advantage. Patients’/clients’ authentic accounts of illness or care can be presented through an interactive virtual learning environment that facilitates interaction without the patient/client having to speak to students en masse.

One of the main strands of CIPeLs work is to test out the validity of possible solutions. CIPeL currently have three areas for staff to consider and engage in learning activites and research utilising technological solutions. These are:
CIPeL in CURVE http://curve.coventry.ac.uk
CIPeL Interprofessional Centre in Second Life (SL) - Coventry University Island.
CIPeL Centre and laboratory in James Starley Building (Coventry University). A physical space where we welcome visitors to meet, and engage with our learning technologies.
One of our current research projects is IPLOMUVE focuses on Interprofessional learning in second life. If you wish to socialise and engage with other IP activities in Second life contact e.clarke@coventry.ac.uk



Professional Identity


Professional Indentity - what is it? when is it acquired or adopted? What does your professional identitiy say about you? Do some professions reinvent themselves? The IPID Applied research group have been considering some of the above questions. Here is the start of relevent literature around Professional Identity:
Jowett R (2008) “The changing role of the academic engaged in health care education” in HEA Newsletter available from: www.health.academy.ac.uk – it identifies how health care academics have to accommodate and perfect new practices and skills.
Aiken S (2007) Identitiy crisis - reality or myth? Presentation at Plymouth ceppl conference 08.10.07
Workman A and Packard J (2007) Professional identitiy in multi-disciplinary teams: a case study. NHS North East.
Hall S (1996)



Strategy/Policy and Interprofessional Education


Here is a start of relevent literature around strategic, policy and political drivers for IPE

Department of Health (2001) Working together, Learning together: a framework for lifelong learning for the NHS. Department of Health, London.
Leatherhead A (ed) (2003) Interprofessional Collaboration.From policy to practice in health and social care. Brunner-Routledge.
Meads G & Ashcroft J with Barr H, Scott R and Wild A (2004) The case for Interprofessional collaboration in health and social care. Blackwell Publishing.

Please add literature that you consider informs this area of IPE. Thank you.



Barriers to Interprofessional/Interdisciplinary working


What are the barriers to interprofessional/Interdisciplinary working?
Here are some possible barriers for you to consider
Different incentives (Ovretveit 1993) Lymbery (1998)
Personality clashes
Different Systems e.g. resource allocation, accountability structures
Professional tribalism
Pace of change
Workloads
Spending constraints
Policy
What does the literature identify?

Here is a start of relevent literature
Stepney P & Callwood I (2006) Collaborative working in Health and Social Care: A review of the literature. University of Wolverhampton. Learning and Teaching Projects 2005/06
Rummery and Glendinning (1997)


Interprofessional Education is proudly powered by WordPress and themed by Mukka-mu